UKOLN AHDS Metadata Analysis Of JISC 5/99 Project Entry Points



A pilot survey of the availability of Dublin Core metadata on the home pages of JISC 5/99 projects has been carried out. The survey makes use of the W3C's Dublin Core Extraction Service and the online Tidy service.

This survey provides a link to the W3C's Dublin Core Extraction Service for each project. This will return the Dublin Core metadata in RDF format which is extracted using an XSLT transformation of an XHTML resource.

If the resource is in HTML format and not HTML it will be necessary to transform the HTML page into XHTML. This survey provides a link to the W3C's Dublin Core Extraction Service for each project in which the input data is a XHTML version of the resource, which has been converted on-the-fly using the online Tidy service.

This Dublin Core metadata is returned in RDF format. If you are using a recent version of Internet Explorer, this should be displayed as an XML resource (as shown in Figure 1). If you are using other browsers you should see the metadata displayed as unformatted text.

Figure 1: Internet Explorer Display Of Dublin Core Metadata Represented In RDF
Figure 1: Internet Explorer Display Of Dublin Core Metadata Represented In RDF

The RDF representation of the Dublin Core metadata can be copied and pasted into the W3C's RDF Validator, as illustrated below.

Figure 2: Visualisation Of Dublin Core Metadata
Figure 2: Visualisation Of Dublin Core Metadata

On 27th November 2002 the survey was updated with a report on the validity of Dublin Core metadata. This was obtained used the DC-dot. The findings are available in the final two columns.

A summary of the findings is given in the following table. The data was taken from the listing of DNER Development Projects.

Table 1: Access to Teaching and Learning Resources
  Project DC Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate DC Display DC
1 ANGEL N N   Check Check - Check  
2 FAILTE Y Y   Check Check Two warnings Check

3 ICONEX N N Could not be processed due to use of Flash Check Check - Check  
4 RESULTs Network N N   Check Check - Check  
Table 2: Enhancing JISC data services for Teaching and Learning
  Project DC Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
5 Biz/ed Virtual Learning Arcade Y Y   Check Check Two errors and two warnings Check

6 CHCC N N   Check Check - Check  
7 Enhancing Beilstein CrossFire Y N   Check Check Two warnings Check

8 e-MapScholar N N   Check Check - Check  
9 Geo-Crosswalk Gazetteer     No Web site          
10 Go-Geo!: The Geo- data Portal Project     No Web site          
11 Timeweb Y N   Check Check One warning Check

12 Using Numerical Data N N   Check Check - Check  

 

Table 3: Images
  Project DC Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
13 ARTWORLD     No Web site          
14 BIOMED Y N   Check Check Three warnings Check

15 BuilDNER Y N   Check Check Two warnings Check

16 Crafts Study Centre     No Web site          
17 Designing Britain 1945-1975 N N   Check Check Could not be checked Check  
18 Filter N N   Check Check - Check  
19 PICTIVA N N   Check Check - Check  
20 Textile Images     No Web site          

 

Table 4: Moving Image and Sound
  Project DC Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
21 Click and Go Video N N   Check Check - Check  
22 HOTBED N N   Check Check - Check  
23 LIFESIGN N N   Check Check - Check  
24 TRILT N N   Check Check - Check  

 

Table 5: Museum Content
  Project DC Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
25 Biota of Early Terrestrial Ecosystems N N   Check Check - Check  
26 Digital Egypt for Universities N N   Check Check - Check  
27 LEMUR N N   Check Check - Check  
28 MIRACLE     No Web site          
29 PATOIS N N   Check Check - Check  
30 Virtual Norfolk Project N N   Check Check - Check  

 

Table 6: Miscellaneous
  Project DC Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
31 EBONI N N   Check Check - Check  
32 INHALE N N   Check Check - Check  
33 PELICAN N N   Check Check - Check  
34 VDML N N   Check Check - Check  

 

Table 7: Infrastructure projects - JOIN-UP
  Project DC Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
35 Docusend N N   Check Check - Check  
36 Xgrain N N   Check Check - Check  
37 ZBLSA N N   Check Check - Check  
38 ZETOC Y Y   Check Check Several warnings Check

 

Table 8: RDN projects
  Project DC Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
39 British Education Portal Y N   Check Check Three warnings Check

40 Computing Gateway Y N   Check Check Several warnings Check

41 Euro Subject Portal for the RDN     No Web site          
42 History online for learning and teaching N N   Check Check - Check  
43 Maths Portal       No Web site        
44 NMAP N N   Check Check - Check  
45 Physical Sciences Subject Portal for the RDN     No Web site          
46 RDN Virtual Training Suite N N   Check Check - Check  
47 SAD-I Y N   Check Check One warning Check

48 SAD-II     No Web site          

 

Table 9: Z projects
  Project DC Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
49 Gate-Z N N   Check Check - Check  
50 JAFER ? ? Could not be analysed Check Check - Check  
51 MIMAS Metadata for the DNER Y Y   Check Check Several warnings Check

 

Table 10: Evaluation projects
  Project Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
52 EDNER N N Several warnings Check Check - Check  

 

Table 11: Studies
  Project Metadata Used? XHTML? Comments Try It (XHTML) Try It (HTML) Valid DC? Validate It Display DC
53 INSPIRAL N N   Check Check - Check  

The information in the table was collected on 28th October 2002, expect for the final two columns (Validty of the DC metadata) which was collected on 27th November 2002.

Notes

Please note the following:

Summary

A summary of the findings is given below.

Table 12: Use of DC Metadata
DC Metadata Used 11 25.6%
No DC Metadata Found 31 72.1%
Metadata Could Not Be Processed 1 2.3%

Note that nine projects had no Web site.