An audit was made of the QA Focus Web site on Monday 14th July 2003.
,rvalidate HTML validation tool was run over the entire QA Focus Web site
from the entry points listed below:
|QA Focus entry point||[View report]||All resources compliant, but only 100 pages checked.||[Validate]|
|Documents Area||[View report]||All 65 resources compliant.||[Validate]|
|Surveys||[View report]||All 32 resources compliant.||[Validate]|
|QA Area||[View report]||The link checking report produced by the Xenu software was not compliant. xx resources were checked.||[Validate]|
Based on these findings the areas audited have been found to be valid HTML.
There have been problems with the missing
div element in the
QA Focus News Blog. This problem has now been resolved by manually changing the pages.
Note that the audit trail reports were initially not HTML compliant and also contained broken links. The following elements had to be added to avoid these problems:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
,rvalidate validation tool cannot currently be used on
the database area of the site. This is being looked into for future audits.
,cssvalidate tool was run over selected resources on the
QA Focus Web site in order to validate a number of the external stylesheet
files. The check was carried out from the entry points listed in the following
|QA Focus entry point||Valid CSS file.||[Validate]|
|Documents Area||Valid CSS file.||[Validate]|
|Case Studies||Valid CSS file.||[Validate]|
|Surveys||Valid CSS file.||[Validate]|
|Presentations Area||Valid CSS file.||[Validate]|
The CSS files checked appeared to comply with the CSS standard.
Note that the validation was carried out using a remote testing service. Since the QA Focus Web site used user-agent negotiation to provide a simplified CSS file to old Netscape browsers this CSS file will not necessarily be validated. Also not that inline CSS declarations on resources on the Web site will not be checked.
Exceptions: This form of validating does not cover inline style sheets. The toolkit area of the site uses inline stylesheets so was checked manually.
,rchecklink tool was run over the entire QA Focus site from
the points listed below:
|QA Focus entry point||[View report]||150 (but not all) resources checked.
Found problems with <http://zetoc.mimas.ac.uk/> with derived PowerPoint files, with known links to non-existent files.
|Documents Area||[View report]||65 documents checked.
Errors reported with links to JISC, Archimuse and ANSI Web sites - but these are believed to be configuration errors on the remote Web site. Internal anchors are broken in the 'print all' files. The <http://www.surrart.ac.uk/whatshappening/galleries/craftstudy.html>, <http://www.chcc.ac.uk/> and the <http://www.mimas.ac.uk/> resources appear to be unavailable due to a server-side problem.
|Surveys||[View report]||32 documents checked.||[Check]|
|QA Area||[View report]||Analysis timed out before completion.||[Check]|
A total of 10 broken (404 error message) links were found on the site. The majority were to the JISC Web site and were caused by a misconfigured server at JISC.
Note that the link-checking tools do have some limitations. For example some Web sites have a short 'time out' time, others blocked access to checking tools by the robots.txt, the Web site may be temporarily unavailable, etc.
In addition to the tool described above the
(version 1.2d) was also used to link-check the QA Focus site. This tool was
used in order to ensure that all resources on the QA Focus Web site were checked
and to see if any link problems not detected by the
tool were found.
Xenu was used first to check local links. Then it was used to check all links.
The Xenu link check results for local links and external links are available. A number of link problems not detected in the above reports were found. These problems are being investigated. Note that some problems are artifacts of the link checking process.
An audit is also made of JISC 5/99 projects Web sites to check that they still exist. This is done by running a link checker over http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/qa-focus/qa/audits/599sites/. Missing sites are noted and changes are made to the QA Focus database.
The NetMechanic spell checker was run over the entire QA Focus site from the points listed below:
A number of spelling mistakes were noted.
NetMechanic only checks 5 pages in one go.
All spelling mistakes were corrected.