Collection Description Focus, Guidance Paper 3 UKOLN

Administrative metadata for collection-level description records



1. The problem

The RSLP Collection Description schema [1] describes a set of metadata attributes for the description of a number of related entities/resources:

(See [1] for a full description of these entities and the descriptive attributes.)

The RSLP Collection Description schema does not prescribe any means of describing the collection-level description record itself. Such information may be useful for several purposes:

2. Administrative metadata for collection-level descriptions

2.1. Administrative metadata attributes

The table below specifies a small set of attributes to describe a CLD record, using properties taken from the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set [2]. All attributes are optional. The prefixes in the XML qualified names are assumed to be associated with XML namespace names as follows:

  • dc: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
  • dcterms: http://purl.org/dc/terms/

Administrative metadata

Attribute label RDF property Definition
Date CLD created dcterms:created The date (in W3C-DTF format) on which the content of the CLD was created.
Creator of CLD dc:creator The name of the agent who created the content of the CLD.
Date CLD last modified dcterms:modified The date (in W3C-DTF format) on which the content of the CLD was last modified.
Modifier of CLD dc:contributor The name of the agent who modified the content of the CLD.
Publisher of CLD dc:publisher The name of the agent who published the CLD, e.g. the organisation or project making this CLD available.
Language of CLD dc:language The language (in the form of a value from the RFC 3066 scheme) of the CLD.
Source dc:source The identifier (URI) of another metadata record from which this CLD is derived. For example, if this CLD is derived from a richer record such as an Encoded Archival Description (EAD) finding aid, then this would be the identifier of that finding aid.
Rights dc:rights A statement about rights held in or over the CLD and/or any restrictions on the use of the CLD.
Audience for CLD dcterms:audience A class of entity for whom the CLD is intended or useful.

2.2. Representing administrative metadata in XML

This first example shows an RDF/XML [3] representation of an administrative metadata record, following the DCMI conventions for representing Dublin Core metadata in RDF/XML [4]. In the example the metadata describes an RSLP Collection Description record in RDF/XML located at http://example.org/rslpcld/cld-gb-248-001.rdf. That CLD is itself derived from an EAD finding aid located at http://example.org/ead/gb-248-001.xml

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">

  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/rslpcld/cld-gb-248-001.rdf">

    <dcterms:created>2001-08-15</dcterms:created>
    <dc:creator>Smith, John</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:modified>2002-12-05</dcterms:modified>
    <dc:contributor>Jones, Mary</dc:contributor>
    <dc:publisher>Example University Library</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en-GB</dc:language>
    <dc:source rdf:resource="http://example.org/ead/gb-248-001.xml"/>
    <dc:rights>This metadata record is copyright Example
       University Library. Permission is granted for personal and
       educational use. Other uses prohibited without permission
       from the publisher.</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:audience>Academic researchers</dcterms:audience>

  </rdf:Description>

</rdf:RDF>

This is an example of an application-specific mechanism for associating the administrative metadata with the CLD record, as suggested in section 4.2 of the RDF Primer [5]. It is intended that the statements should be interpreted as applying equally to all the statements in the document described.

The second example shows the same metadata represented according to the DCMI conventions for a non-RDF representation of Dublin Core metadata in XML [6]. This might be used, for example, in the (optional) about element of an OAI GetRecord response [7]:


<admin_dc:admeta
  xmlns:admin_dc="http://example.org/admin_dc/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
  xsi:schemaLocation="http://example.org/admin_dc/
                      http://example.org/admin_dc/admeta.xsd">

  <dcterms:created>2001-08-15</dcterms:created>
  <dc:creator>Smith, John</dc:creator>
  <dcterms:modified>2002-12-05</dcterms:modified>
  <dc:contributor>Jones, Mary</dc:contributor>
  <dc:publisher>Example University Library</dc:publisher>
  <dc:language>en-GB</dc:language>
  <dc:source>http://example.org/ead/gb-248-001.xml</dc:source>
  <dc:rights>This metadata record is copyright Example
     University Library. Permission is granted for personal and
     educational use. Other uses prohibited without permission
     from the publisher.</dc:rights>
  <dcterms:audience>Academic researchers</dcterms:audience>


</admin_dc:admeta>

Some issues

3.1. RSLP CLDs as composite descriptions

As noted above, a CLD conforming to the RSLP Collection Description schema is actually a set of descriptions of a number of related entities. In some cases, it may be necessary/desirable to provide administrative metadata for each of these descriptions, rather than for the "composite" description as a whole. If that is the case, the same set of attributes/properties could be used but would need to be associated more precisely with the appropriate part of the CLD.

3.2. Machine-readable rights description

There are a number of standards/specifications for rights description languages which allow the creation of machine-readable (rather than free text, as in the example above) descriptions of rights to resource access and use.

Acknowledgements

The issue of administrative and rights metadata for CLDs was raised in a Discussion Group at the second Collection Description Focus Workshop [8].

This proposal is based in part on the proposal for administrative metadata requirements for the metadata records shared in the Resource Discovery Network [9].

References

[1] RSLP Collection Description: Colection Description Schema. May 2000. Available at http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/rslp/schema/

[2] Dublin Core Elements and Element Refinements. Available at http://dublincore.org/usage/terms/dc/current-elements/

[3] Dave Beckett, ed. RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised). W3C Working Draft 8 November 2002. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20021108/. Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/.

[4] Stefan Kokkelink & Roland Schwänzl, Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in RDF / XML. Available at http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-rdf-xml/

[5] Frank Manola & Eric Miller, eds. RDF Primer. W3C Working Draft 11 November 2002. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-primer-20021111/. Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/.

[6] Andy Powell & Pete Johnston, Guidelines for implementing Dublin Core in XML. Available at http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-xml-guidelines/

[7] Carl Lagoze, Herbet Van de Sompel, Michael Nelson & Simeon Warner, eds. The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. Version 2.0. Available at http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html

[8] Collection Description Focus Workshop 2: Discussion Group 1: Rights issues and CLDs. Feb 2002. Available at http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/cd-focus/events/ws2/disc1/

[9] Resource Discovery Network: Discussion paper for Interoperability Meeting, 12 Dec 2002. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. Available at http://www.rdn.ac.uk/publications/interop-standards/notes-2002-12-12.html