This page provides a local copy of the annotation of the annotations of the
discussion on "Blogs".
This copy was taken on 23 November 2004. The copy was made in case the
main page
is deleted, the service becomes unavailable or the content is overwritten.
Please use this page for notes on the discussion group on Blogs
BrianKelly
Question posed: why use blogs instead of for example e-mail?
Report on Blogs Discussion Group
This is the report of the red-team discussion group. There were several users of blogs, mostly personal.
There were two structured implementations discussed: at University of Warwick and a JISC-supported project on Mobile Blogs.
Most of the information comes from these groups.
Identify ways in which blogging might be used in teaching, learning and research
- as part of the personal development portfolio
- peer review of work-in-progress
- providing feedback to the university on course and instruction
- recreational use
Blogs vs Wikis
- blogs where there is a voice
- blogs where the timeline or historical record is useful
- wikis for collaboration
- wikis where the current status is useful
Selection and Deployment
- set limits to the size of the inplementation and set expectations
- there are several free/oss packages that can be tried out
-
- but they will lack features useful in a learning environment
- often aimed at individuals rather than a corporate hosted environment
AUP, Training, Support
- All needed.
- AUP before starting!
- Training and support and selling the concept needed for students and staff
Likely Technologies
- other software mentioned:
-
- pepple - free/oss, lightweight functional
- roller - Java, used at Sun
Other Issues
- Retention of data?
- Use by non-current staff/students - external staff, alumni
- AUP: monitor vs report-and-takedown - choose the later
- Export of data
- Access controls: important to be clear: Warwick system provides levels e.g. private, groups: peers, staff, public
– 2004-11-23 ChrisBenson
The blue team had a similar discussion but a great deal centred on acceptable use.
This was brought up in the Wiki discussion and the closing remarks also. Just to stir it up, my opinion is that trying to create a distinct AUP/Computing Reg for each and every new "thing" is complete folly. Have your generic policy as vanilla as possible and use that to catch everyone. If anyone can persuade me of a reason not to do so I'd be pleased to hear...
JeremySpeller