|
Title:
|
NISO Metasearch Initiative Proposed Vocabulary Encoding Scheme : ConspectusLevel |
|
Creator:
|
NISO Metasearch Initiative Task Group 2
|
|
Date Issued:
|
2005-05-07
|
|
Identifier:
|
|
|
Replaces:
|
|
|
Is Replaced By:
|
Not applicable
|
|
Latest Version:
|
|
|
Status of Document:
|
This is a Working Draft of NISO Metasearch Initiative Task Group 2
|
| Description of Document: | This document presents a proposal from the NISO Metasearch Initiative Task Group 2 for a new encoding scheme, ConspectusLevel. |
|
|
|
| Name | ConspectusLevel | ||||||||||||
| Label | Conspectus Level | ||||||||||||
| Definition | A set of six numeric values used to indicate the level of completeness of a collection in a specified subject area. | ||||||||||||
| Values |
[Full definitions to follow]
|
||||||||||||
| Examples |
[as SubjectCompletenessIndicator]
RDF/XML example (RDF Graph)
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:prop="http://example.org/proposed/terms/">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Finnish National Collection</dc:title>
<prop:subjectCompleteness>
<prop:SubjectCompletenessIndicator>
<prop:completenessSubject rdf:type="http://purl.org/dc/terms/LCSH"
rdfs:label="Finland" />
<prop:completenessLevel rdf:type="http://example.org/proposed/terms/ConspectusLevel"
rdf:resource="http://example.org/proposed/terms/ConspectusLevel/5" />
</prop:SubjectCompletenessIndicator>
</prop:subjectCompleteness>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
|
||||||||||||
| Type of term | Class/Vocabulary Encoding Scheme | ||||||||||||
| Term qualified |
(Proposed property) |
||||||||||||
| Why needed |
Conspectus has been in use in the U.S.A. since 80’s, and it is becoming popular in Europe as well; for instance the national collection description initiatives in Czech Republic and Finland have chosen to rely on Conspectus. It is the only generic tool for indicating the completeness of collections. |
||||||||||||
| Working Group support | |||||||||||||
| Proposed status | |||||||||||||
| Related DCMI terms | None |
||||||||||||
| Related non-DCMI terms |
(Proposed property) The Conspectus levels are defined within the Conspectus specification. However, no URIrefs have been assigned to denote the level scheme or the individual levels. |
||||||||||||
| About the proposers |
completenessLevel property, rather than completeness property.