Title:
|
NISO Metasearch Initiative Proposed Vocabulary Encoding Scheme : ConspectusLevel |
Creator:
|
NISO Metasearch Initiative Task Group 2
|
Date Issued:
|
2005-05-07
|
Identifier:
|
|
Replaces:
|
|
Is Replaced By:
|
Not applicable
|
Latest Version:
|
|
Status of Document:
|
This is a Working Draft of NISO Metasearch Initiative Task Group 2
|
Description of Document: | This document presents a proposal from the NISO Metasearch Initiative Task Group 2 for a new encoding scheme, ConspectusLevel. |
|
Name | ConspectusLevel | ||||||||||||
Label | Conspectus Level | ||||||||||||
Definition | A set of six numeric values used to indicate the level of completeness of a collection in a specified subject area. | ||||||||||||
Values |
[Full definitions to follow]
|
||||||||||||
Examples |
[as SubjectCompletenessIndicator]
RDF/XML example (RDF Graph) <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prop="http://example.org/proposed/terms/"> <rdf:Description> <dc:title xml:lang="en">The Finnish National Collection</dc:title> <prop:subjectCompleteness> <prop:SubjectCompletenessIndicator> <prop:completenessSubject rdf:type="http://purl.org/dc/terms/LCSH" rdfs:label="Finland" /> <prop:completenessLevel rdf:type="http://example.org/proposed/terms/ConspectusLevel" rdf:resource="http://example.org/proposed/terms/ConspectusLevel/5" /> </prop:SubjectCompletenessIndicator> </prop:subjectCompleteness> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> |
||||||||||||
Type of term | Class/Vocabulary Encoding Scheme | ||||||||||||
Term qualified |
(Proposed property) |
||||||||||||
Why needed |
Conspectus has been in use in the U.S.A. since 80’s, and it is becoming popular in Europe as well; for instance the national collection description initiatives in Czech Republic and Finland have chosen to rely on Conspectus. It is the only generic tool for indicating the completeness of collections. |
||||||||||||
Working Group support | |||||||||||||
Proposed status | |||||||||||||
Related DCMI terms | None |
||||||||||||
Related non-DCMI terms |
(Proposed property) The Conspectus levels are defined within the Conspectus specification. However, no URIrefs have been assigned to denote the level scheme or the individual levels. |
||||||||||||
About the proposers |
completenessLevel
property, rather than completeness
property.