<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/">
<title>Plenary Talks at IWMW 2006</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/</link>
<description>Details of the Institutional Web Management Workshop 2006 Plenary Talks</description>
<dc:language>en-GB</dc:language>
<dc:date>2006-04-24</dc:date>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>

 <rdf:li resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/scott/" />  
 <rdf:li resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/webb/" />  
 <rdf:li resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/gilbey/" />  
 <rdf:li resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/forbes-pitt/" />  
 <rdf:li resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/sidhu/" />  
 <rdf:li resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/metcalfe/" />  
 <rdf:li resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/powell/" />  
 <rdf:li resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/panel-1/" />  
 <rdf:li resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/debate/" />  

 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/resources/images/ukoln-logo/logo.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/resources/images/ukoln-logo/logo.gif">
<title>UKOLN</title>
<url>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/resources/images/ukoln-logo/logo.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/scott/">
<title>Plenary Talk 1: Real World Emerging Technologies</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/scott/</link>
<description>Chris Scott from Headscape gave a talk on "Real World Emerging Technologies". 
Falling University entries and top-up fees have contributed to a step-change in the operational environment for the HE sector. This change has resulted in an acute pressure on institutions to innovate for success. This presentation will explore some opportunities for institutions to capitalise on new and emerging web technologies in response to such changes. While there is much hype about Web 2.0, there are some genuine opportunities for straightforward applications of Web 2.0 technologies in institutions that are low risk and low cost, and have potential for significant returns if they are introduced and managed correctly and the right people are involved. </description>
<dc:date>2006-06-14</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/webb/">
<title>Plenary Talk 2: Developing a Web 2.0 Strategy</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/webb/</link>
<description>Michael Webb, IT and Media Services Head, University of Wales, Newport gave a talk about how Web 2.0 technologies are changing the way our staff and students (potential, current and past) relate to one another and our Universities. Embracing these technologies provides a great opportunity to enhance the University experience, but also presents a number of risks and challenges. So how do Universities develop a strategic approach to embracing Web 2.0?  </description>
<dc:date>2006-06-14</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/gilbey/">
<title>Plenary Talk 3: Managing Standards - Delivering a Quality Assured Web Environment</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/gilbey/</link>
<description>Universities undertake research through a mesh of partnerships, collaborations and contractual relationships. Major research funding bodies, such as government departments, are increasingly encouraging their contractors to adopt formal quality assurance standards - such as ISO 9001:2000. If you haven't come across this already, you are likely to see it very soon! 
In this talk John Gilbey, Institute QA Manager, IGER discussed the impact of quality standards on the way Web resources - internal and external - are defined, delivered, managed and reviewed in academic environments. An over-view of the quality requirement is presented, along with some pragmatic suggestions to help you deal with it. </description>
<dc:date>2006-06-15</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/forbes-pitt/">
<title>Plenary Talk 4: Delivering Information: Document vs. Content</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/forbes-pitt/</link>
<description>Kate Forbes-Pitt, Systems Manager, Web Services, London School of Economics will talk about aims aims to problematise the document, asking the following questions: what is a document? 
How does it impart information to its reader? Can it be replicated on screen? It proposes answers using the arguments of Hughes and King (1993) who contend that the document is a layered social artifact that exists to 'wrap' content. This 'wrapping' provides the reader with the knowledge they need in order to apply social rules to their reading of the document, and so become able to interpret its content. Some information systems writers argue that the need for social knowledge in a task negates the possibility of its automation. Following the logic of this argument, delivering a document (a container of rule) through the existing set of social rules that govern Web interaction, means that the full function of the electronically reproduced document becomes masked or confused. 
At best this makes the role of the document superfluous to its content, making the content difficult to interpret. At worst it makes the content incomprehensible to the user. This raises a further question: what purpose is served by reproducing documents online? Following from the above arguments, it is possible to argue that 'pure' content, rather than the imitation of printed paper, is likely to be a more successful way of imparting information through the Web. </description>
<dc:date>2006-06-15</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/sidhu/">
<title>Plenary Talk 5: Sector Statistics</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/sidhu/</link>
<description>Ranjit Sidhu from Nedstat gave a talk about how after discussions with various people in the education sector it became clear that there was a requirement for some industry wide statistics about Web site activity. These Sector Statistics will provide organisations, specifically universities, with a means of benchmarking the performance of their Web site.</description>
<dc:date>2006-06-15</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/metcalfe/">
<title>Plenary Talk 6: What Does Openness Mean to the Web Manager?</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/metcalfe/</link>
<description>Randy Metcalfe, OSS Watch and Brian Kelly, UKOLN gave a plenary on openess and the Web 
manager. Openness appears to be all the rage: open standards for interoperability, open source for 
software development and deployment, and open content for sharing knowledge. What brings these 
phenomena together is a commitment to openness. But how do colleges and universities engage with 
openness? And more particularly, what does it mean for institutional Web managers.</description>
<dc:date>2006-06-15</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/powell/">
<title>Plenary Talk 7: Reflections on 10 years of the Institutional Web</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/powell/</link>
<description>Andy Powell gave a talk about how it goes without saying that the Web has changed 
significantly over the last 10 years and that institutional Web sites have changed with it - just 
use the Wayback Machine to look back at your own site in 1996 to see what I mean. Such changes have 
not simply been in terms of style and substance but also in terms of how we expect to interact with, 
use and re-use the content and services being made available to us. In short, the Web has changed us 
and the way we learn and work. This talk will look back over the last 10 years and highlight some of 
the key technical, social, political and legal changes that have taken place and the impact these 
have had on the institutional Web sites we deliver now and will deliver into the future.</description>
<dc:date>2006-06-16</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/panel-1/">
<title>Panel Session 1: Web 2.0: Behind the Hype</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/panel-1/</link>
<description>The Web is changing. It is no longer a phenomenon but has integrated itself 
within our culture. However for those creating Web services times are far from stable. 
A wide range of Web-based applications continue to be developed, such as blogs, wikis, 
podcasting, social networking software, RSS feeds etc. The Semantic Web is still on the 
cards and now we have Web 2.0, an opportunity for a more sharing, more participative Web? 
Is it just hype? Will these progressions make any difference to the way in which we go about 
our work? What does Web 2.0 mean to the Institutional Web? This panel session offered three 
different perspectives on the potential of Web 2.0 within learning activities - the library 
perspective, the commercial perspective and the HE/FE perspective.</description>
<dc:date>2006-06-16</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/debate/">
<title>Debate 1: CMS: Challenging the Consensus</title>
<link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/talks/debate/</link>
<description>In previous IWMWs sessions have focussed on issues such as: Should we buy or build our CMS? 
Which CMS should we implement? How do we implement our CMS? How can we measure the impact of our 
CMS Implementation? And how do we address The CMS Challenge? But last year it was claimed that 
"There is no such thing as a silver bullet" and that a CMS will not solve all your problems. 
Has the CMS bubble bust? Has content management become content mis-management? In the light of 
new approaches, such as Web 2.0, and new 'ways of doing things' is there a feeling of disillusionment 
with 'ye old CMS'? Or does a CMS remain the backbone of a good institutional Web site? In this debate 
you will hear the arguments for and against content management systems and will have an opportunity 
to express your views.</description>
<dc:date>2006-06-16</dc:date>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>
