| Draft
categorisation (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| • | Earliest schemas
were largely conceptual in |
||||||||||||||
| nature: |
|||||||||||||||
| – | e.g. Pittsburgh
BAC model, Cedars outline |
||||||||||||||
| specification,
OCLC/RLG WG |
|||||||||||||||
| • | Gradually moving
towards a more practical |
||||||||||||||
| focus: |
|||||||||||||||
| – | e.g., VERS, NLNZ,
METS, PREMIS |
||||||||||||||
| – | Based on XML
(DTDs and Schemas) |
||||||||||||||
| • | But there is an
urgent need for this |
||||||||||||||
| experience to be
shared |
|||||||||||||||
| – | e.g., briefing
papers, advice to implementers |
||||||||||||||
| Beginners Guide to
Metadata, Glasgow, 19 May 2004 |